网站首页 全球最实用的IT互联网站!

人工智能P2P分享Wind搜索发布信息网站地图标签大全

当前位置:诺佳网 > 软件工程 > 后端开发 > .Net >

hangfire内部执行器是同步的,会导致死锁 - Rick

时间:2026-01-31 22:44

人气:

作者:admin

标签:

导读:再次遇到dotnet的第三方组件问题,就是hangfire的CoreBackgroundJobPerformer会导致死锁,它是作为hagnfire服务端的job执行器的,它非常的关键,是job能够运行的关键,这些库可能读是从很早的d...

再次遇到dotnet的第三方组件问题,就是hangfire的CoreBackgroundJobPerformer会导致死锁,它是作为hagnfire服务端的job执行器的,它非常的关键,是job能够运行的关键,这些库可能读是从很早的dotnetfremework时代移植过来的(我猜测的),同样的存在同步调用异步代码的问题,会导致死锁。

它有问题的代码如下:

namespace Hangfire.Server
{
    internal sealed class CoreBackgroundJobPerformer : IBackgroundJobPerformer
    {
        private object InvokeMethod(PerformContext context, object instance, object[] arguments)
            if (context.BackgroundJob.Job == null) return null;

            try
            {
                var methodInfo = context.BackgroundJob.Job.Method;
                var method = new BackgroundJobMethod(methodInfo, instance, arguments);
                var returnType = methodInfo.ReturnType;

                if (returnType.IsTaskLike(out var getTaskFunc))
                {
                    if (_taskScheduler != null)
                    {
                        return InvokeOnTaskScheduler(context, method, getTaskFunc);
                    }

                    return InvokeOnTaskPump(context, method, getTaskFunc);
                }

                return InvokeSynchronously(method);
            }
            catch (ArgumentException ex)
            {
                HandleJobPerformanceException(ex, context.CancellationToken, context.BackgroundJob);
                throw;
            }
            catch (AggregateException ex)
            {
                HandleJobPerformanceException(ex.InnerException, context.CancellationToken, context.BackgroundJob);
                throw;
            }
            catch (TargetInvocationException ex)
            {
                HandleJobPerformanceException(ex.InnerException, context.CancellationToken, context.BackgroundJob);
                throw;
            }
            catch (Exception ex) when (ex.IsCatchableExceptionType())
            {
                HandleJobPerformanceException(ex, context.CancellationToken, context.BackgroundJob);
                throw;
            }
        }
        private object InvokeOnTaskScheduler(PerformContext context, BackgroundJobMethod method, Func<object, Task> getTaskFunc)
        {
            var scheduledTask = Task.Factory.StartNew(
                InvokeOnTaskSchedulerInternal,
                method,
                CancellationToken.None,
                TaskCreationOptions.None,
                _taskScheduler);

            var result = scheduledTask.GetAwaiter().GetResult();//同步执行异步
            if (result == null) return null;

            return getTaskFunc(result).GetTaskLikeResult(result, method.ReturnType);
        }

        private static object InvokeOnTaskSchedulerInternal(object state)
        {
            // ExecutionContext is captured automatically when calling the Task.Factory.StartNew
            // method, so we don't need to capture it manually. Please see the comment for
            // synchronous method execution below for details.
            return ((BackgroundJobMethod)state).Invoke();
        }

        private static object InvokeOnTaskPump(PerformContext context, BackgroundJobMethod method, Func<object, Task> getTaskFunc)
        {
            // Using SynchronizationContext here is the best default option, where workers
            // are still running on synchronous dispatchers, and where a single job performer
            // may be used by multiple workers. We can't create a separate TaskScheduler
            // instance of every background job invocation, because TaskScheduler.Id may
            // overflow relatively fast, and can't use single scheduler for multiple performers
            // for better isolation in the default case – non-default external scheduler should
            // be used. It's also great to preserve backward compatibility for those who are
            // using Parallel.For(Each), since we aren't changing the TaskScheduler.Current.

            var oldSyncContext = SynchronizationContext.Current;

            try
            {
                using (var syncContext = new InlineSynchronizationContext())
                using (var cancellationEvent = context.CancellationToken.ShutdownToken.GetCancellationEvent())
                {
                    SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(syncContext);

                    var result = InvokeSynchronously(method);
                    if (result == null) return null;

                    var task = getTaskFunc(result);
                    var asyncResult = (IAsyncResult)task;

                    var waitHandles = new[] { syncContext.WaitHandle, asyncResult.AsyncWaitHandle, cancellationEvent.WaitHandle };

                    while (!asyncResult.IsCompleted && WaitHandle.WaitAny(waitHandles) == 0)//这里也同样
                    {
                        var workItem = syncContext.Dequeue();
                        workItem.Item1(workItem.Item2);
                    }

                    return task.GetTaskLikeResult(result, method.ReturnType);
                }
            }
            finally
            {
                SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(oldSyncContext);
            }
        }

有问题的代码就是
var result = scheduledTask.GetAwaiter().GetResult();
以及
while (!asyncResult.IsCompleted && WaitHandle.WaitAny(waitHandles) == 0)

截至目前1.8.22版本还是没有解决这个问题,有人提了issue了,但是要到2.0.0版本才会解决。

作者:Rick Carter
出处:http://pains.cnblogs.com/
本文版权归作者和博客园共有,欢迎转载,但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明,且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接,否则保留追究法律责任的权利。

温馨提示:以上内容整理于网络,仅供参考,如果对您有帮助,留下您的阅读感言吧!
相关阅读
本类排行
相关标签
本类推荐

CPU | 内存 | 硬盘 | 显卡 | 显示器 | 主板 | 电源 | 键鼠 | 网站地图

Copyright © 2025-2035 诺佳网 版权所有 备案号:赣ICP备2025066733号
本站资料均来源互联网收集整理,作品版权归作者所有,如果侵犯了您的版权,请跟我们联系。

关注微信